Comments on: Anti Islam Film and Dual Standards of the Western World

By: Truth

Truth — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 09:57:00 +0000

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country/region/city they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. Say Nation % Muslim United States 1.0% Australia 1.5% Italy 1.5% Norway 1.8% Canada 1.9% China 2.0% At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs: Nation % Muslim Denmark 2.0% United Kingdom 2.7% Germany 3.7% Spain 4.0% Thailand 4.6% From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. Nation % Muslim Switzerland 4.3% Philippines 5.0% Sweden 5.0% The Netherlands 5.5% Trinida and Tabago 5.8% France 8.0% At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world. When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris: car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons). Nation % Muslim Guyana 10.0% India 13.4% Israel 16.0% Kenya 10.0% Russia 15.0% After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning: Nation % Muslim Ethiopia 32.8% At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare: Nation % Muslim Bosnia 40.0% Chad 50.1% Lebanon 59.7% From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels: Nation % Muslim Albania 70.0% Malaysia 60.4% Qatar 77.5% Sudan 70.0% After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide: Nation % Muslim Bangladesh 83.0% Egypt 90.0% Gaza 98.7% Indonesia 86.1% Iran 98.0% Iraq 97.0% Jordan 92.0% Morocco 98.7% Pakistan 97.0% Syria 90.0% Tajikistan 90.0% Turkey 99.8% United Arab Emirates 96.0% 100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ ? the Islamic House of Peace ? there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim: Nation % Muslim Yemen 99.9% Afghanistan 100.0% Saudi Arabia 100.0% Somalia 100.0% Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons like Shiya, Sunni, Wahibi, Ahmedi etc

By: RE

RE — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 18:24:00 +0000

Hi there,

I am English, and not a muslim. I’m not particularly politically affiliated – I’m not a fan of the “system”, I’m a man of peace, love and the easy life : )

I can’t talk for the double standards of press or anything like that, but what I can give you is the straight views of I guess the people that make up England/the UK. Lots are like me, not so passionate about religion or politics (each to their own) but the train of thought is put simply:

Lots of very innocent people died because of a YouTube video.

Thats how we see it. People lost their lives, people fought. Because of a YouTube video. We don’t even know who posted it.

Because we aren’t politically or religiously motivated, we don’t understand it. And while I personally DO understand the reasons, the whole situation doesn’t compute with me. The poor people who were killed in a blind retaliation. Thats all we’re hearing this side.

I wish you all the best, and hope this calms down.

Regards,

Loving Englishman

By: Khurram

Khurram — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:07:19 +0000

You have answered your own question. As you say’ ” We have discussed this before that how differently and strictly they deal with situations that harm their own beliefs but they will show utter disrespect for situations that hamper Muslim beliefs.”
Isn’t it logical? Because in Muslim countries, Muslims control the situations that harm Muslims own beliefs and show utter disrespect for situations that hamper others beliefs. (I can’t know for the life of me how the words ‘harm’ and ‘hamper’ fit here, by the way)
For example, you have this blasphemy law that puts people to death for ‘blaspheming’ against your faith and prophet, but you haven’t got any such death sentence for those who may ‘blaspheme’ against Hinduism, Christianity or any other religion. So you are protecting your own interests here in Muslims countries, and then you expect from non-Muslim countries to keep your interests above theirs/ If anything, this is double standard. Try to analyze issues with an open mind and unbiased position.

By: Rafz

Rafz — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 20:03:13 +0000

I have been following this conversation between Anis akram and the admin.Well u quoted the right phrase chana gandum wali..Well this article above potrays the true image of West..their dual standards And Mr.Anis is constantly trying to steer away from the main point.How Muslims should protest and how they should lead their lives is entirely a new debate and on that very issue we can go on and on..We r talking about west here who claims to be the most cultured civilication and talking about their government who is still reconsidering the matter…huh!! They are trying to pretend as if they r so helpless.What else is it if not their double standards when it comes to issues related to Muslims.

By: Pakistani

Pakistani — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 10:25:07 +0000

‘And in a world with just over 1 billion Muslims and a total population over 6 billion people, you’re not going to defeat them.’

Totally agree

By: Shahid Saleem

Shahid Saleem — Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:40:56 +0000

If your goal is to defeat them, you have already lost. Your goal should be to help ourselves. Whether they are defeated or not is just a side effect.

And in a world with just over 1 billion Muslims and a total population over 6 billion people, you’re not going to defeat them.

By: Bilal

Bilal — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:59:39 +0000

I 100% agree with this post. We should do work really hard and in a proper way to come up economically, socially and morally. Then we will be able to defeat them.

By: Salman78

Salman78 — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:47:53 +0000

You wrote “abe b Allah ke Rasol ki mohabat dilon me mojad hy”

Jin ki aap baat kar rahe hain unhon ne Rasool (P.B.U.H.) ki taalimaat ka zara bhi khayal nahe kia, sirf naam le kar apne he logon ko naqsan de raha hain. Kya yehi hay mohabbat k apne mehboob ki baat na mano aur us ka naam le le kar violence karte raho?
Islam aqal ka deen hay, jehalat k andheron ko khatam karta hay, but practically we are not following Islam and doing what is expected from Jahil…

By: Salman78

Salman78 — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:29:34 +0000

what’s the difference? pura blog english may hay, wo samaj aaraha hay to ye P.B.U.H kyon nahe aa raha?

By: ImranG

ImranG — Thu, 20 Sep 2012 08:49:39 +0000

So, that means this is one part of religion for which we have no logical explanation for death penalty.
This means if any non-Muslim asks for clarification in this area (and his acceptance of Islam rightfully depends upon this question) and all we have to say is answer doesn’t exist.

So, this means anybody can refute Islam. This means Islam is not a perfect religion since answer for this crucial question doesn’t exist.
This means we cannot defend punishment of a person who has committed blasphemy under our Islamic laws.