Dowry Must Be Mentioned in Nikkah Certificate: LHC

The provincial government of Punjab has been directed by the Lahore High Court to introduce a new clause in the marriage certificate (Nikkahnama) which will include the dowry items given by the woman’s family.

This to address the issue of exactly what can be taken back by them in case of divorce and to reduce the amount of problems people have to go through to get their possessions back.

This amendment has come about as a result of a written petition filed by a woman who was personally affected by the lack of such a clause. She had previously challenged the “miscalculation” of the dowry items she was owed in a lower court of Bahawalpur.

According to Justice Tariq Iftikhar Ahmed,

There should be a law which would state upon marriage, all things relating to marriage i.e. dowry should be duly incorporated in the columns of Nikahnama so that the miseries and obstacles of the female litigants could be curbed down in future and providing a strong and concrete social and legal set-up.

In his verdict the concerned judge noticed that the problem of dowry had grown large enough to become a social threat even in modern times in the country. It has led to the oppression of women going as far as physical violence against brides while also being the leading cause of financial and emotional stress to families with a lot of daughters.

The judge said:

This stigma should be removed and shackled with an iron hand at grassroots level and should be uprooted to maintain serene and harmony in society.

Furthermore, the judge also stated that he regretted that governments in Pakistan had constantly followed and retained all the laws that the British had implemented without any amendments. This has led to personal laws being very different in Pakistan depending on the religion of the person and Muslim and Christian women have even fewer rights.

He also noticed that the inclusion of this clause in the marriage certificate would be a game changer for a lot of reasons. It would ensure that the woman gets all her dowry back rather than just what the man’s family decides to give her by making any offense punishable under law.

Via Dawn

    • Why? Dowry is the Sunnah of Prophet PBUH. Just like Nikah is the Sunnah. Prophet PBUH gave dowry to her daughter which he could afford!
      You should ban those cheap people (larky waly) who ask for Cars, Plots and Banglows in the dowry.

      • Jo log larki waloon se chezein mangtay hein mein unhein be-gherat tareen log samajhta hon, aor is soch ko aam karnay ki zarurat he. Hazaroon larkiyan jahez ki “demands” par pura na utarne ki waja se ghar bethi hein.

        Waldain hamesha apni aulad se muhabbat kartay hein aor jitna bhi un ke bas mein hota he unhein chezein detay rehtay hein. Isi wajah se Allah ke Rasool (S.A.W.W) ne apni beti ko ghar ke istemal ki kuch choti moti ashya di thein. Usay hum us istelah mein jahez nahi keh saktay jis tarah is waqt raaij he. Wo to aik gift tha, gift to jab marzi diya ja sakta he, sari umar diya ja sakta he. Compulsory to nahi hota.

    • dowry should be banned rather than mentioning on nikah formdowry should be banned rather than mentioning on nikah formdowry should be banned rather than mentioning on nikah form

    • I think dowry isn’t going anywhere. and it seems like a good decision as some people don’t give those items back to girl after divorce.

  • Such a clause is already there in nikah nama. People dont fill it. Even if its made mandatory, wont make much difference.
    In courts, a defendant husband almost always claims shamelessly that the plaintiff wife left his house alongwith valuables and kids, on her own accord. So they blame the woman to have taken away her valuables as well as his.
    Just a while ago,a big court declared that women usually keep gold in their custody when relations get strained. With such a mentality, no amount of record keeping in nikah nama would work in addressing the misery of women. Patriarchal mentality needs to change, not nikah nama.

  • Ltd feature videos

    Watch more at LTD