Amid heightened tensions between Pakistan and India, a wave of anti-state content and hate speech has emerged on social media, particularly on YouTube, where several bloggers, both domestic and overseas, have allegedly been involved in spreading fake news and targeted campaigns against Pakistan and its institutions.
The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) has stated that it is actively working to curb the spread of such content, although its mandate is limited to the removal and blocking of illegal online material, while legal action falls under the jurisdiction of law enforcement agencies.
According to the PTA spokesperson, the authority has so far blocked a total of 119,496 URLs for spreading content against Pakistan’s security and national integrity, including 3,248 YouTube URLs.
When asked about foreign-based YouTube channels involved in such campaigns, the spokesperson confirmed that a list of URLs has been sent to YouTube for action. However, the details of these lists cannot be disclosed due to confidentiality policies.
On Pakistan’s request, YouTube has so far blocked 68 Indian YouTube channels from being accessible within Pakistan. Additionally, Pakistani YouTubers Ahmad Noorani and Waqar Malik have also had their channels blocked locally at the government’s request. The spokesperson confirmed that these channels are no longer accessible from within Pakistan, even though some users claim they are still operational.
Regarding the controversial Pakistani vloggers Imran Riaz, Sabir Shakir, Siddique Jan, and Shahbaz Gill, the PTA spokesperson said that the matter is under review, and any action will be taken in accordance with government instructions. However, the PTA clarified that it does not have authority over arrests or the filing of legal cases against individuals running such campaigns; this falls under the domain of law enforcement bodies.
The PTA stated that multiple legal provisions including the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA), Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), and the Constitution of Pakistan can apply to such offenses. The nature and severity of the content determine the punishment, which may include imprisonment, fines, or both. The PTA added that it continues to monitor hate-driven and anti-state content online and remains committed to safeguarding national interests in the digital space.
So do it? No mercy for anti state
Good Step
In light of the recent developments between India and Pakistan, we have witnessed the strength and resolve of our armed forces. Despite this, there are still individuals who seek to exploit the situation for political gain. It is neither appropriate nor justified for anyone to make such statements during these sensitive times.
We have seen the valor and capability of the Pakistan Army, an institution that stands as a symbol of our pride and honor. Without their dedication, our circumstances could have been as dire as those faced by the people of Palestine.
Anyone attempting to politicize this national moment should be held accountable and made an example of.
I love my country. I love my Pakistan Army.
The opposing view isn’t said to be anti-state
Who invented “Opposing View” ?
It doesn’t exist
It’s just Anti State
Respected Sir,
An opposing view is a fundamental part of a healthy discourse. Disagreement doesn’t equate to hostility constructive criticism strengthens institutions rather than weakens them. Labelling all dissent as anti-state risks silencing necessary conversations for your kind information.
Regards.
So people who are in India and are speaking against Indian aggression on Pakistan are also anti-state? and should be punished as such? What about people in countries like US who are speaking against their country’s policy? particularly waging wars around the world, should they also be considered anti-state and tried as such? Grow the heck up and think before you speak.
So why should we expect others to do that ?
Should Israelis always support israel actions ?
Should Russians and indians blankly support actions ?
Should indians just support indian military actions and whatever they say ?
Dissent and criticism are crucial for growth, both for individuals and institutions. An opposing view doesn’t inherently mean hostility; rather, it fosters accountability and progress. If every disagreement is labeled as ‘anti-state,’ where does constructive dialogue go? Free societies thrive on discussion, not suppression
Ahhhh yes yes
Anti state content . That’s how much you trust your own people who pay taxes and Contribute to this beggar country economy
Instead of responding normally you threaten
So PTA wants to behave like indian media who did the exact same thing
All against Pakistan, this is not disgusting and horrible
Pakistani illegall Government can do nothing better