The Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) has upheld the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP)’s order dated May 27, 2025, against Kingdom Valley (Pvt.) Limited to deposit a penalty of Rs. 35 million for misleading consumers about the location and approval status of its housing project.
During the proceedings, the Commission observed that Kingdom Valley had engaged in deliberate deceptive marketing by portraying its project, actually located in Mouza Choora, Rawalpindi, as being in Islamabad through billboards, social media, and other advertisements, thereby misleading consumers to command higher value.
It was further noted that the project was widely promoted as “NOC approved” even before formal approvals were obtained, indicating a calculated strategy to deceive.
In its detailed judgment, the Tribunal endorsed the Commission’s findings, holding that the company had clearly misrepresented the project by advertising it as “Kingdom Valley Islamabad” despite its actual location in Rawalpindi. It also noted that advertisements had been launched prior to obtaining approvals, reinforcing the element of deception.
Rejecting Kingdom Valley’s defence that similar practices were prevalent in the sector, the Tribunal observed that “the deception angle becomes insurmountable when violation occurs in broad daylight,” adding that “two wrongs never make one right.”
While upholding the violation under Section 10(2)(b) of the Act, relating to dissemination of false or misleading information to consumers, the Tribunal maintained the penalty of Rs. 35 million, terming the misstatement of the project’s location a “grave default.” It emphasized that such practices are particularly harmful in the real estate sector, where consumers are frequently misled by exaggerated claims, often resulting in significant financial losses.
The Tribunal further directed that failure to deposit the penalty within 20 days would result in restoration of the Commission’s original order in its entirety, exposing the company to higher financial liability.
So does this also apply to metro city in gujar khan which is marketing as Rawalpindi with billboards near T Chowk
penalty of Rs. 35 million is peanuts against the billions it might have already earned; and what damages if any has it caused to purchases ; I guess none. What about dha2 Islamabad; the land for which was taken away on dc rate from owners for Army ops. N training use but has been converted to a mega commercial use while the owners not paid or compensated in commercial terms. Even court cases can’t be filed.