IMF Rejects Pakistan’s Circular Debt Management Plan

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has rejected Pakistan’s rationalization and circular debt reduction measures a day after the Energy Ministry (Petroleum Division) reassured of productive deliberations with the lender.

IMF’s Mission Chief to Pakistan Nathan Porter said in response to a query late Monday night, “In our view, the proposed plan does not address the underlying problems. In particular, the CD neutrality of the tariff rationalization plan is doubtful and it would place a significant additional burden on vulnerable households”.

He said restoring the viability of the energy sector is critical to Pakistan’s economic recovery and fiscal sustainability. For this, the government needs to focus on broad-based reforms, including reducing the high cost of energy, improving compliance and reducing theft and line losses, ending captive power, and fixing the governance and management of the DISCOS, as well as keeping up with regular tariff adjustments.

“The CD ‘reduction plan’ entails fiscal risks given the chain of transactions involved and would also continue the use of supplementary grants which have placed a considerable burden on the fiscal accounts in recent years,” he stated.

He also said, “We are open to working with the government and other international partners to advance a sustainable reform plan addressing the issues mentioned above which, if successfully implemented, would allow tariffs for all classes of consumers to fall”.

On Sunday, the Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division) on Sunday dispelled reports created by some media reports regarding delays in the circular debt reduction and tariff rationalization plans due to no consent given by the IMF. The lender’s mission chief’s statement contradicts the Petroleum Division, prompting further doubt on whether Pakistan would be able to get all agenda items in order this time.

Last week the caretaker government virtually met with IMF to discuss tariff rationalization and circular debt reduction measures. Now turned down, the proposed tariff rationalization cut the industry’s tariff from 14 cents per unit to 8.5-11.75 cents per unit via a subsidy-neutral approach. Meanwhile, the energy sector’s circular debt stock of Rs. 1.27 trillion was supposed be settled with funds from the Government of Pakistan.

Follow ProPakistani on Google News & scroll through your favourite content faster!

Support independent journalism

If you want to join us in our mission to share independent, global journalism to the world, we’d love to have you on our side. If you can, please support us on a monthly basis. It takes less than a minute to set up, and you can rest assured that you’re making a big impact every single month in support of open, independent journalism. Thank you.


  • Pakistani leaders sy zayada to IMF vulnerable qoom ka kheyal ker rahay hai…It is true that steps outlined by IMF are necessary instead of just increasing cost for home consumers. IMF nay root cause highlight ker deya hai…. Kuch sharam kero leaderoo….awam de khal he loon ty zoor hy sara….apni pockets dheeli na kerna…IMF zindabad.

  • It is not IMF duty to highlight where line losses are, where power theft is, which institutions are not paying their bills, free units given to employees of WAPDA and other high profile people are contributing towards circular debt. You can’t pass everything to poor consumers who pay their bills honestly, yet, they are denied electricity facility uninterrupted.
    It was said and understood that reason for hight cost of electricity is agreements with IPp’s . But one must understand that agreements with IPP’S are more than two decades old. Some of contracts with some IPP’S has expired and electricity charges have increased many fold since than. What is govt proposed strategy to reduce circular debt is? Why people are not encouraged to use more electricity in winter when the demand is minimal as we have to pay capacity charges in any case.
    Let’s have open seminar on this issue rather than making discussion in hefty files.
    Contracts with IPP were not in favor of country. That is history. Is there any remedial measures. Take the general public in to confidence.

  • Very good IMF, it was a totally unworkable plan. These so called Pakistani experts should be sent home asap before they mess up everything


  • Get Alerts

    Follow ProPakistani to get latest news and updates.


    ProPakistani Community

    Join the groups below to get latest news and updates.



    >