Pakistan’s Current Growth Rate is 2.4%— 0.3% Lower Than June 2019’s Estimates: World Bank

Pakistan’s GDP growth rate is projected to bottom-out at 2.4 percent in the fiscal year 2019-20 and 3 percent in 2020-21, says a World Bank (WB) report.

In its latest report “Global Economic Prospects, slow growth, policy challenges”, WB forecasts Pakistan’s current year growth rate at 2.4 percent — about 0.3% lower than its estimates of June 2019 — which will touch 3 percent next fiscal year and 3.9 percent in the fiscal year 2022-23.

The report stated that growth in Pakistan is projected to languish at 3 percent or less through 2020 as macroeconomic stabilization efforts weigh on activity. Activity in Pakistan has decelerated in response to a contractionary monetary policy intended to restore domestic and external balances. Policy adjustments to address macroeconomic imbalances in Pakistan also weighed on aggregate growth in this group, maintained the report.

Macroeconomic adjustment in Pakistan, including the continuation of a tight monetary policy and fiscal consolidation, is expected to continue. Growth is projected to bottom-out at 2.4 percent in the fiscal year 2019-20 (July 2019 – June 2020). Thereafter, as macroeconomic conditions improve and structural reforms support investment, growth is projected to steadily advance, reaching 3.9 percent by the fiscal year 2021-22.

Inflation has been mostly stable in the region on the back of weak domestic demand and broadly stable currency markets, with the notable exception of Pakistan.

Pakistan’s budget deficit rose more sharply than expected. Contributing factors were a shortfall in revenue collection, combined with a sizable increase in interest payments, stated the report.

Comparison With Other South Asian Countries

South Asia’s growth is estimated to have decelerated to 4.9 percent in 2019, substantially weaker than 7.1 percent in the previous year. The deceleration was more pronounced in the two largest economies, India and Pakistan. Weak confidence, liquidity issues in the financial sector (India), and monetary tightening (Pakistan) caused a sharp slowdown in fixed investment and a considerable softening in private consumption.

Export and import growth for the region as a whole moderated, in line with a continued slowdown in global trade and industrial activity. Business confidence was hampered by subdued consumer demand in India and security challenges in Sri Lanka.

Demand faltered amid credit tightening, reflecting structurally high non-performing assets (e.g., Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan), liquidity shortages in the non-bank financial sector in India, and tightening policies in Pakistan.

In Pakistan, growth decelerated to an estimated 3.3 percent in the fiscal year 2018-19, reflecting a broad-based weakening in domestic demand. The significant depreciation of the Pakistani rupee (the nominal effective exchange rate depreciated about 20 percent over the past year) resulted in inflationary pressures. Monetary policy tightening in response to elevated inflation restricted access to credit. The government retrenched, curtailing public investment, to deal with large twin deficits and low international reserves.

Bangladesh, the third-largest economy in the region, fared better than India and Pakistan, with growth officially estimated at 8.1 percent in the fiscal year 2018-19.

The weak global trade outlook will continue to weigh on regional export growth in the near term. Regional economic activity is expected to benefit from policy accommodation (India, Sri Lanka), improvement in business confidence and support from infrastructure investments (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan).

Although recent tensions between India and Pakistan have abated, a re-escalation would damage confidence and weigh on investment in the region.

Tax Collection

Lack of progress in reforms to improve tax collection could result in more acute revenue shortfalls (Bangladesh, Sri Lanka) and put further pressure on elevated fiscal deficits. This could have negative consequences for infrastructure investment and projected growth, as well as for the fiscal space available to respond to a future cyclical downturn.

For countries with elevated debt levels and large current account deficits (Pakistan, Sri Lanka), an unexpected tightening in global financing conditions could sharply raise borrowing costs and lead to stops in capital inflows.

In the post-crisis period, a slight moderation in India’s productivity growth, and larger declines in the smaller economies of Afghanistan, Bhutan and Sri Lanka, was partially offset by pickups in Bangladesh and Pakistan.

Annual Productivity Growth

In Pakistan, annual productivity growth picked up from a pre-crisis average of 2.4 percent to 3.1 percent during 2013-18, slightly below the EMDE average of 3.4 percent. During the post-crisis period, productivity growth benefited from strong foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows and infrastructure projects which supported private sector activity. In Pakistan, productivity growth was limited by macroeconomic instability.

Productivity levels in the three largest economies of SAR—India, Bangladesh, and Pakistan—are lower, ranging between 14 and 27 percent of the EMDE average, reflecting their relatively large informal sectors, low urbanization rates, and weak financial development.

Many firms cite infrastructure gaps as important obstacles to their business activities. Firms that cited infrastructure obstacles were found to be less productive in Pakistan and Bangladesh.

Moreover, firms facing infrastructure obstacles have been found to be less productive than others in Pakistan and Bangladesh. Improved infrastructure in the energy and transportation sectors, as well as technology-oriented capital accumulation, can promote productivity growth and boost international competitiveness.

Political instability seems to be a more severe obstacle to the operations of South Asian firms than in other EMDE regions.

Strengthening economic policy institutions, improving monetary and fiscal policy frameworks, and enhancing financial regulation and supervision can help to provide a stable macroeconomic framework for firms, reduce uncertainty, and boost productivity.


  • Army will send wave after wave of sick and hungry people to fight india. That seems to be their long term plan for the country.

    • Why I’m not surprised that you are an Indian.

      Pakistanis no matter what happens eat more than Indians and Indians know that very well ? That is more obvious when your compare general physique of population of both countries.


  • >