Zionist Led Anti-Islam Campaigns and How Best to React

IQRA BISMI RABBIKAL LAZI KHALAQ

By Sohail Ahmed

They have done it again and they will most certainly keep propagating such anti-Islamic campaigns in future. Muslims are mostly unsure on how best to react to such incidents.

From blocking YouTube and Facebook to demanding the removal of anti-Islamic content, we have tried it all and quite frankly nobody listened.

Boycott and Ban is Not a Long-Term Solution

Muslims need to use internet and technology in much the same way as everyone else and this is one thing that enemies of Islam are well aware of. There is a pattern of use of new media in recent anti-Islamic campaigns (remember Facebook and Twitter support of draw Muhammad day). They are hitting only where it hurts most.

Unlike using traditional media (as they did in 2005) now they are using internet to provoke Muslims, which they will keep following until they get a better tool than internet to spread their anti-Islam agenda.

The dual standard and bias western media allows anti-Islamic content under the umbrella of “freedom of speech” and this has been discussed many times.

I have always supported the ban on social media websites in past, as many of you did, when they refused to respect the sentiments of Muslims, but I think this is not a long-term solutions.

The use of these services is now more of a necessity than a choice. You can’t live in a world without using these technologies or you will be left further behind. Simply assume a life without Gmail, Google, Android or iOS – what else you will be left with? Isolation only.

The social networks are reality of new world order and Jewish lobby is influencing and controlling the new media as they always controlled the traditional media. If you don’t know only 6 Jewish companies control 96% of world media.

And they are using this control to shape up our habits, trends, thinking, culture and to provoke us.

Before you decide to criticize me of blaming Jews for all our problems, know some facts about the movers and shakers of new media by clicking this link.

Here let me ask you one question:

With such kind of power and mission, do you still think that Google, Facebook and YouTube will listen to Muslim concerns and will take action against anti-Islam content?

Long Term Solution

The only long-term solution for Muslims is to play a vital role in new media by competing with the today’s technology giants. Muslim entrepreneurs have to work smart to tip the new media scale in favor of Muslims. Why we have not seen a single web 2.0 success story from Muslim world? You may ask. In my opinion, we lack at two fronts.

“Remarkable” Ideas

The most important ingredient for the site that will be the next face of web 2.0 is a unique idea that is remarkable (worth talking about). People move from one service to another every now and then (remember friendster, orkut, myspace, Bebo etc) so new “remarkable” ideas will eventually replace Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. These new social media and network platforms will keep replacing the old ones. The future of content distribution will remain online for many years to come.

Raising Venture Capital

Building a site of epic magnitude will come at a cost. That is the reason why venture capital firms exist. You will need to hire great engineers and designers in industry to launch your idea, meet scaling up challenges and need money to rent office space and other regular expenditures of company.

In short, you need the seed capital from angel investors for your startup. Raising capital is not easy unless you are in Silicon Valley, have connections with VCs beside a great idea to pitch. Things can change if Muslim billionaires consider investing in local startups instead of buying luxury private jets.

The Immediate Response:

Convey the Message of Islam using Available Resources

 

While sharing Quranic verses and Hadiths on Facebook or YouTube is good, we should concentrate on spreading the message of Islam to non-Muslims. Getting more ‘Likes’ or ‘Shares’ does not do justice to Islam. Here a few ideas on how we can use internet against the evil that is being spread in the name of ‘freedom of speech’.

  • Provide resources for people who want to know about Islam (Hint: research what people want to know about Islam using Google trends/Google insights for search etc and build sites around those topics).
  • Reply to the questions that people are raising about Islam on forums, YouTube and other social media websites. Do not let people spread evil against Islam and get away with it, reply with logic.
  • Share inspirational stories of newly converted Muslims (there are hundreds of them online).
  • Share the Islamic stance and views on issues of modern world including terrorism, justice, equality and human rights.

Internet is double-edged sword. If Zionists are using new media to propagate anti-Islam campaigns, we can use their weapons to show the world the real message of Islam and reach to the masses.

At the same time, we have to work smart to play our role in new media. It is not a matter of choice anymore and censorship is not a permanent solution.

Conclusion:

Boycotting them isn’t the solution. Learn, regroup, unify and then compete with them.

Writer tweets at @Pakblogger when he is not managing itdunya.com

Image By Saminaz Creation


      • This is a site that blames the “media” for not showing peaceful protests, but every single article on this site that is controversial generates more ad revenue.

        So, they go with controversy.

        • Now you are being racist for the blogposts here. Dont let the hatred get the better of you. Do you come here daily?

          • I didn’t mention any race to discriminate against. Please, if you’re going to try and insult me, do it with some measure of intelligence.

            And I visit multiple times a day. I FEED off your ignorance. It makes me feel WONDERFUL to be the one-eyed king in the land of the blind.

        • Well yes, thats my point. This blog looks and sounds more like our tv channels to be honest. Find something religious or political and It just needs a remote connection with something IT or telecom…Voila! controversy achieved…more views, more comments!

        • Now, you are against this site because It’s discuss the real issues in pakistan and the thing like youtube block in pakistan lol

    • I don’t think discussing new media strategies, dual standards of Youtube and Facebook should go on a religious/ political discussion forum only

  • i totally agree , your approach is true & appropiate….

    Our logical answers will not only give us chance to understand Islam but also will help us to make our directions according to the sayings…

    Very Nice & positive school of thought!!!

  • Point #1: just because a company has a Jewish CEO or a Jewish VP of Engineering **DOES NOT MAKE THE COMPANY JEWISH**.

    I cannot believe how many people fall for this idiotic level of thinking.

    When India had a Muslim president, did it suddenly become a Muslim country? Of course not.

    When you look at companies, you need to look at the shareholders. NOT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR THE OFFICERS.

    Point #2: Jimmy Wales of Wikipedia claims to be an atheist. Whether or not he was born a Jew or not (and there are conflicting reports about this), he says he’s an atheist and acts like an atheist, so he’s an atheist.

    Point #3: When has Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, etc — all of which you claim are Jewish & Zionist owned — when have they stopped you from preaching Islam?

    N E V E R

    Not Once.

    They have done more to let Muslims spread the word of Islam with their websites than any technology in the past (other than the printing press, I suppose).

    Think about it again. You say they are evil, but without their web sites and their social systems and their money, you would not be able to preach to more Muslims than ever before.

    PERSPECTIVE: get it?

    • Reply to Point # 1: You got my point totally wrong. “NO, it does not make company jewish” but when jews are holding
      top position in all new media companies+traditional media much more than their population share, it will certainly create jewish hold.You said “When India had a Muslim president, did it suddenly become a Muslim country? Of course not.” Not, but what if 96% of indian government is in Muslim control? will they allow anti-islamic propaganda? You said “When you look at companies, you need to look at the shareholders. NOT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OR THE OFFICERS.” completly wrong. Shareholders do not take day-to-day decisions at company. Top management does. I wish you know more about how these companies run.

      Reply to Point # 2: Many reports suggest otherwise, top management of Wikipedia visit Israel more than they visit other countries
      outside US. Why? No apparent reasons.They certainly have strong connections with Israel.

      Reply to Point # 3: “When has Google, Facebook, Wikipedia, etc — all of which you claim are Jewish & Zionist owned —
      when have they stopped you from preaching Islam?”. My answer is never and i neved wrote they stopped us BUT they
      propagate anti-islamic campaigns and delete anti-jew content. WHY? If there is no Jew influence, why they do not treat
      all religions equally?

      I wish you would add some points on how muslims should react in this situation. That would have been helpful.

      • The thing you left out is MONEY. They are not interested in Jewish internet, or Christian TV. They Are In The Business Of Making Money. They WILL and DO take anti-Jewish positions (if they are Jewish, or anti-Christian positions if they’re Christian) if it makes them Money.

        That’s what it means to be on the board of a public corporation: INCREASE SHAREHOLDER VALUE. If they don’t do that, THEY GET SUED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS.

        Secondly, your analogy is false: NONE of the companies you reference are anywhere near 96% Jewish controlled, or even 66%. NOT. A. SINGLE. ONE. Referencing a site with CLEARLY VERIFYABLE LIES on it isn’t going to help you one bit.

        Point #2: EVIDENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. Where’s your evidence that they take more trips to Israel than any other location? Let’s look at Wikimedia’s own site about their meetings: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Meetings — how frequently do you see Israel there?

        Okay, so their visits to Israel are “unofficial”. Fine. Please show me the list of who in Wikipedia corporate visited which countries, and how frequently. You say you have it, so let’s see it.

        Point #3: I can find anti-Israeli content on Youtube. I can find anti-Pakistani content on Youtube. I can find anti-Judaism content on Youtube. I can find anti-Islam content on Youtube. What’s the problem?

        I’ll tell you what the problem is: you don’t know that being “Jewish” is, for over 99% of the Jews, a racist thing. Because, unlike Christians or Muslims or Buddhists — Jews are a *race* and over 99% of them are the *same race*. Anyone can convert to Islam, black, white, brown, whatever their skin color or parents. NOT THE SAME WITH JEWS.

        When you say “Jewish” you mean a particular race. Just like when you say “Tamil” or “Japanese”. If you find anti-Japanese content on Youtube, it’s a hate crime and can be removed if reported. If you find anti-Shinto content on Youtube, it’s NOT a hate crime.

        • #3 – Rubbish. You have uttered the same gibberish which was used to make laws protecting jewish sentiments. The century, where such arguments were rampant, is gone.
          If i take only the jew collection at auschwitz, and not jews as the whole, i should be able to claim their culling as reasonable and not get jailed. Right?

          • I don’t care about sentiments. I care about facts. If you have a FACTUAL ARGUMENT that shows that Jews are not a race, show it.

            If I upload an “anti-Paki” video to Youtube in the UK, it will get taken down. But that does not suit your “Jews get special treatment” argument so you ignore it.

            Yet, ignoring it does not make it a fiction.

            And the fact that you are obsessed with Holocaust also shows what little you know. In World War 2, Jews were only the largest GROUP of people killed in death camps. They also killed many Christians (of the wrong type of Christianity), many Gypsies, many other “minorities.” Go educate yourself before you spew more lies.

        • “That’s what it means to be on the board of a public corporation: INCREASE SHAREHOLDER VALUE. If they don’t do that, THEY GET SUED BY THE SHAREHOLDERS.” I am afraid you have no idea what you are talking about here. Companies and public corp make and lose money,they make it clear for all investors at time of investing. So no, they don’t get sued. Remember ‘Cuil’? they raised $33 million in venture capital in 2007/08 and guess what. they are out of business alread. The net profit for investors is a big fat zero.
          Reply Point # 2: “EVIDENCE SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. Where’s your evidence that they take more trips to Israel than any other location?” wrong again, or lack of info maybe. If you only look at Jimmy Wales history, he was ‘Israeli Presidential Conference in Jerusalem on Oct. 22, 2009’. For what reasosns? how many other countries presidential confrences he has attended? He was at israel presidential conference again in 2011. Reason? no one knows. According to JTA (The global news service of jewish people) “Jimmy Wales helped open the third Israeli Presidential Conference with President Shimon Peres”. This is only jimmy wales, Sue Gardner, Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation which runs Wikipedia has been to israel and so has been leading wikipedia editor David Shankbone (Miller). Do they visit other neighbouring countries when they are in region. NO. Why israel? is this biggest country and they do it to market wikipedia NO. how many presidential conferences did Jimmy wales attended beside israeil’s.
          Point 3: Make a page on FB to discuss holocost reallity ant let me see how far you go. Make a page against muslims and you will be covered under “freedom of speech”…..
          I love when you defend jews and get caught and move on to next point. I would love to know your stratgey on how muslim should respond in these situations.

          • — I am afraid you have no idea what you are talking about here.

            Let me guess: you don’t know anything about business, either. Except as a customer.

            Companies & BODs DO get sued all the time by their shareholders if they do not do the right thing. Recent famous example: When Yahoo refused to sell to Microsoft, their own shareholders sued them. Just read other examples here:

            https://www.google.com/search?oq=shareholder+sued+*

            I’m not going to go through all the links line by line to explain the difference between them and Cuil.

            In fact, your example of Cuil is, at best, demonstration of what little you know about the business world. Cuil took the money, and DID create a working product. Cuil could show their investors (different from shareholders — you know the legal difference, right? Pretty sure you don’t) what they had produced. The product didn’t do well, so they closed up.

            — If you only look at Jimmy Wales history, he was ‘Israeli Presidential Conference in Jerusalem on Oct. 22, 2009’. For what reasosns? how many other countries presidential confrences he has attended?

            Oh man, you are so ignorant. So so ignorant. You should run as MNA with that level of ignorance.

            Did you stop to wonder what the Presidential Conference is? I did, because I didn’t know what it is. And, here’s what it is: The “Israeli Presidential Conference” is a high level conference being held in Jerusalem once every 18 months under the auspice of the Israeli President and Nobel Prize laureate, Shimon Peres. The meeting, titled “Facing Tomorrow”, brings together the world top leaders and thinkers in a wide variety of fields and courses including policy, energy, science, economics, culture, art, religion and thought to navigate the most pressing global challenges ahead.

            And looking over the attendees of the conference over the past four years, I see people like Mikhail Gorbachev, Sergey Brin, Sarah Silverman, etc. Politicians, businessmen, writers, actresses. Wow. Such EEVVILL PEOPLE!

            And you ask what other countries Presidential conferneces he has attended? Well, I don’t know of any other countries that have presidential conferences about science and culture. Do you? (Answer: nooooooo)

            But let’s see what else he’s taken part in. World Economic Forum — visited in 2007, co-chair in 2008. Also in 2012, and I’m not sure but I think 2010. Wow, with all those visits to Davos, Switzerland, by your reasoning he must be SWISS!

            — Do they visit other neighbouring countries when they are in region.

            I don’t know, is it normal to visit France when you fly to England? Is it normal to visit Tashkent when you fly to Islamabad? It’s not to me. You’re full of weird questions.

            FYI, Wikimania 2008: held in Egypt. And they’re trying to decide whether to open an office in Egypt or Jordan soon, because of the growth of Arab language Wikipedia.

            — Make a page against muslims and you will be covered under “freedom of speech”.

            Let me make one thing very clear to you. I do not consider stupid lies about Muslims OR about any other religion to be equivalent of Da’wah. They are worth nothing compared to Da’wah. So if you want to promote holocaust denial, understand that you are NOT preaching Islam here, you are NOT posting anything equivalent in POWER as Da’wah. You are trolling.

            When Facebook or Wikipedia or Google+ removes pages that PROMOTES Da’wah and the spreading of Islam (and not for reasons like “promoting violence against non-Muslims), only then I will rethink using the services. As long as they let us preach, they are giving us a FREE space for promoting our religion.

            & I don’t care if you get blocked for trolling about Jews or the holocaust or wahtever. You do not represent Islam when you post those lies.

            Lastly, I will end by noting that you’ve been 100% silent about my FACTUAL CLAIM about your referenced site. Unless somehow you invented a time machine and sent us back to 2004 and Eisner is still the CEO of Disney. Wow, do you even do any research???

      • Propaganda machines depend on crowd sourcing these days. Google or Facebook dont officially propagate anti-islam material – in fact no religious material at all. Public does.
        In many countries, holocaust denial (the scam of the century) is a crime by respective laws. We have to be strong enough to get such laws slated. A collective demand by Muslim countries is what we need. And not just demand but also a follow up.
        Remember, jews have feelings. Muslims dont. We have to work hard and work wise. Shouting at them will not budge them.
        Rest of your points are valid.

  • Great Article! I just recall one saying here! “If you want to spread something; talk about it, if you wan to bury something; keep silence! Let these jewish dogs bark and concentrate on propagating the real message of Islam. Learn, Learn and Learn because knowledge is the power that you will need to compete with western world.

  • Mr.Sohail Ahmed.I totally disagree with one of your opinion i.e to stop the boycott of these sites.You said “The use of these services is now more of a necessity than a choice. You can’t live in a world without using these technologies or you will be left further behind. Simply assume a life without Gmail, Google, Android or iOS – what else you will be left with? Isolation only.” buddy are you serious?? Each and every single human can live without these things.So, for this I will say “DON’T SAY THIS AGAIN”.Secondly, I totally agree with you on the Long Term Solution.The reason why we fail every time is simple.And i.e we don’t open those sites, we just use stupid Facebook and Twitter.So, when these sites will be blocked everyone will try to find an alternative.

    • You can argue about Faceshit and Twitter. However, many Google products have undeniable importance primarily due to the scale of their infrastructure. They make our life easier yet our life does not depend on them. To retain our existence, we eat food and ensure our safety. Everything else we do is meant to make our life easier.

  • Conclusion: Boycotting them isn’t the solution. Learn, regroup, unify and then compete with them.

    Well written & concluded … I think Social Media has become a part of our lives rather
    than a choice… now, it depends on us how constructively we use it…
    Muslims are talented, they have made significant progress in every field
    of today’s life and they have bright minded & passionate youth…
    The only thing lacks is Faith & Unity which has gone with our Ancestors…

  • The best & Ultimate reaction/solution to this issue is that the Muslims make them selves so much technologically advanced such that they don’t need to depend on the west in the future. For it to happen, we should concentrate on education..

    Just look at the past, in the era from 10th to the 18th century, the west invested on big universities like oxford, cambrdge, howard etc, while our Mughal rulers concentrated on building castles, memorials etc.

    Hence this all is a result of more than 700-800yrs planning that west is ahead of us & we are unable to hit it in anyway.

    So the SOLUTION IS EDUCATION

  • I wish this great Pakistani Blogsite would confine itself to technological issues. If there’s anything Muslims need today, it is technology, which comes through education. Lets all work towards that goal.

  • Your suggestions are valid but there is another point of view: Agar main aap k baap ya maan ko gaali don to kya ap mujhay long term planning ker k jawab daingey ya mujh say sirf rooth (boycott ) jaingey ya phir usi waqt thappar maraingey kyoun keh badlay main gali nahi dee ja sakti !!! Balkay ya to aap mera mon tor daingey ya phir mujhay qatal kerdaingey. Han is qism ka badla laynay k liay ghayrat and taqat zaroor chahiay.

    • Agar aap kisaan houn aur gaali dene wala waderah hou tou aap hath jor rakhoge :) tou behtar hai hum kisaan ban kar boycotts karne k bajaye, pehle taqatwar ban jayein takay koi humein gaali dene ki jurat na kar sake, hum yeh azli haqeeqat kyu nahi samjhte ke insaaf sirf taqatwar ke lye hota hai, aur boycott sirf kamzoro k lye, aur in the end jeet’ta taqatwar hi hai,

  • Ltd feature videos

    Watch more at LTD

    close
    >